Those ‘good eye contact’ myths
It would have been funny…
.. if it weren’t so sad.
He was trying really hard – the electrical goods salesman. He’d come through the one-size-fits-all school of communication skills in which he’d learned a few rules for how to create rapport with people.
And he was sticking to those rules.
Resolutely and determinedly.
Well, that’s what they’d taught me!
He’d obviously learned that ‘good eye contact is important’ so he was using every trick in the book to get the customer to look him in the eye…
– asking her direct questions
– pausing after she answered
– asking her ‘more information’ questions
– mentioning her name and then pausing, and so on.
But NO! The customer was having none of this!
She wasn’t into this eye contact thing at all. Definitely not!
And she successfully countered all of the salesman’s efforts. She’d look at the product, look out the window, gaze at the ground or the ceiling, in fact anywhere except into the salesman’s eyes.
It’s best not to intervene
Me? I was hanging around waiting to be served. I’d only popped in to make a casual enquiry about a product.
(And, experienced salespeople know that a lot of sales are made if ‘casuals who pop in’ are well looked after!)
Now, because I train people in selling and influencing, I couldn’t resist surreptitiously observing this unequal struggle.
In fact, I felt quite sorry for the salesperson. I was almost tempted to take him by the elbow and say “Look, it’s not working. Try something different – like doing communicating her way!”
You see, I empathise with the salesman. It was an area which I’d struggled with for years in my early days, both as a junior manager and in direct selling.
I’d read lots of books on communication skills and learned, variously, that
– you should look steadily into their eyes
– or look at the area between their eyes
– or, worse, look at their mouths
– or even, amazingly, defocus and look at their ears!
The result of my studies?
Following these rules on how to do it right, made me so self-conscious of where I was looking that I found it difficult to remember what I was saying or supposed to say – or why I was saying it.
The Myth about ‘Good Eye Contact’
This was the current advice over 50 years ago. But, it’s amazing how many communication skills’ books and courses perpetuate the myth.
For example, and especially, there’s the myth of Good Eye Contact… This usually, and for some reason or other, suggests gazing steadily and fixedly into the other person’s eyes.
And, yes, like any communication skills’ rule this will work fine… for a few people – some of the time!
And for many others it’s likely to be a quite uncomfortable experience – or an annoying one – or they’ll begin to wonder whether you’re trying to hypnotise them or ask them for a date, or both.
So if you meet lots of people in your work or social life it’s a good idea to think about how you make eye contact.
It is, after all, one of the first things that people use to form their first impression of you!
Common Eye Contact styles
Take a little while observing people – you’ll soon recognise that there are many different eye contact styles.
Here are the four most common methods:
(1) The Fixed Stare
Their eyes never leave you and practically bore through you.
This style is often accompanied by the Knuckle Cruncher Handshake. Occasionally this style is used as a power trick to intimidate or to give the impression that the person is more confident than they really are. Much used by politicians who have been thoroughly coached in how to appear a lot more trustworthy than they often turn out to be!
(2) The Darting Glance
They do look at you – but with very brief glances.
They tend to look at you only when your gaze is averted. This style can give the impression of either low self confidence or lack of trustworthiness so if it happens to be your natural style you might want to change things so you don’t convey such a non-verbal message.
(If you have done some NLP training you’ll recognise that, rather than indicating untrustworthiness or low confidence this lack of eye contact can be due to their personal thinking style. Many people have developed the habit of needing to look away, or even close their eyes momentarily, in order to think about what they are saying. See this article on the NLP Eye Movements.)
(3) The No-Eye-Contact style
Their eyes rarely, if ever, meet yours. They look past you, or even off to the side, use peripheral vision to watch you. This style is much favoured by country dwellers where lifestyle does not included many opportunities for gazing into the eyes of other humans.
You may have noticed, while out in the open country, that there is a tendency to use somewhat less eye contact and to stand further from one another than would be the norm on a city street. As with the Darting Glance the style can be misinterpreted. However the No Eye Contact style is more likely to be a learned behaviour than an essential part of their thinking strategy. The No-Eye-Contact style can also be related to cultural or religious norms.
(4) The Turn-And-Turn-About
This is the most common style. I look quite steadily at you while you are speaking. (Although, if you appear to find this uncomfortable, I look away occasionally to avoid creating tension). When it is my turn to speak you look at me steadily while I still meet your gaze but look away a little more (to think, gather my thoughts, check my feelings, etc.).
‘Good’ Eye Contact
The best approach, and one suggested in NLP, is ‘meet them where they are’.
‘Good eye contact’ is what the other person considers to be good eye contact!
There isn’t a standard one-size-fits-all style.
- If they use the Fixed Stare: While speaking to them look at them for longer than you might otherwise do. But avoid getting into I-will-not-look-away-until-you-do competition. When you are doing the listening give them quite sustained eye contact. (If, at first, you find this a little uncomfortable you can ease your own tension by varying your expression and by using head nods and ‘Uh-huh’ sounds.)
- If they use Darting Glances: Giving them sustained eye contact will be perceived as aggressive or even intimidating. Adopt a somewhat similar style by looking away more than might be normal for you, especially as you are doing the speaking.
- If they use Minimal Eye Contact: Make much less eye contact that you might normally do. Practise using your peripheral vision to watch them. (Incidentally, it is quite likely that these people will also prefer to maintain a larger personal space zone so avoid moving too close to them.)
And the best method of all…? Use the Soft Eyes technique.
…how did that electrical goods salesman fare?
He never did get ‘good eye contact’ with his customer. And I doubt he got the sale, either. The customer said she’d think it over – still not making ‘good eye contact’ – and left the store.
Maybe she came back again. Maybe not.
Me? Watching the little scene distracted me from the product I had wanted to enquire about.
So I left the store, too. It wasn’t his day.
This was originally in our NLP Newsletter and I received the following email from one subscriber – just three hours after she received this newsletter.
Just to let you know that I’ve just starting using this method and its impact is immediate! But what do you do when there is more than one person? Try to incorporate both, or switch between them? Or neither?
My reply (on the latter point):
“When there’s more than one I tend to let the situation and my objectives dictate my style.
As a very general rule in meetings etc., I’ll pay most attention to the person with whom I am currently talking – and occasional connecting-glances to the others. Otherwise I will tend to use what is normal for me and wait for the one-to-one situations afterwards in order to match their style.
Now in creating Rapport with a group, or when addressing a meeting or conference for example, I’ll use a variety of styles and approaches. Including matching body language with key players (the ones that I recognise others are deferring to) and using the key 3-5 seconds of eye contact with each person to create rapport with them at a number of levels.”
The Pegasus NLP Newsletter
The above article was originally in our monthly newsletter. It’s published every 2-4 weeks and is free.
And there will be no spam – I promise. You have trusted me with your email address I will use it for the Newsletter and for nothing else – and it will never be shared with anyone else. Ever.